PHARMACEUTICAL IP

  • Our Offering
    • Fractional in-house
    • Start-ups
    • Established pharma
    • International IP counsel
    • Investors
    • Due diligence
  • Fractional in-house
  • Sectors
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Biotechnology
    • Biologics
    • Cell & gene therapies
    • AI drug discovery
    • Chemistry
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • Webinars
    • Subscribe
  • About us
    • Our team
    • Join us
    • Contact us
  • Our Offering
    • Fractional in-house
    • Start-ups
    • Established pharma
    • International IP counsel
    • Investors
    • Due diligence
  • Fractional in-house
  • Sectors
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Biotechnology
    • Biologics
    • Cell & gene therapies
    • AI drug discovery
    • Chemistry
  • Insights
    • Articles
    • Webinars
    • Subscribe
  • About us
    • Our team
    • Join us
    • Contact us
  • Our offering
  • Fractional in-house
  • Sectors
  • Articles
  • Our team
  • Join us
  • Our offering
  • Fractional in-house
  • Sectors
  • Articles
  • Our team
  • Join us

Articles

Search & filter insights:

Search & filter insights:

Alexion’s Soliris sequence error saga (Alexion v Samsung Bioepis [2025] EWHC 1240)

  • 4th June 2025
Beware! The recent Samsung v Alexion UK High Court decision reveals that even a single-letter error in patent sequence data, coupled with vague descriptive language, can invalidate your claims and lead to costly legal battles.

All to play for in CRISPR “first-to-invent” US patent battle as Federal Circuit instructs PTAB to reconsider (Regents v. Broad Institute, Nos. 22-1594, 22-1653)

  • 28th May 2025
Navigating the complex CRISPR patent landscape remains a challenge. The Federal Circuit’s decision in Regents v. Broad Institute is another in the ongoing battle between the inventors of CRISPR.

Event report: C5 Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation in Europe (Day 1), Plausibility, UPC and antibody IP strategy

  • 27th May 2025
Navigating European pharma and biotech patent litigation is more complex than ever, with ongoing debates on plausibility, UPC intricacies, claim interpretation, and divergent strategies for antibody inventions.

An LLM is not (yet) a person skilled in the art (T 1193/23)

  • 20th May 2025
The EPO clarifies that an LLM interpretation of a technical term in a patent is not yet evidence of how a skilled person would interpret the term.

First UPC decision to tackle infringement and validity of second medical claims (Sanofi v Amgen, UPC_CFI_505/2024)

  • 19th May 2025
Understand the UPC’s first ruling on second medical use patents, which clarifies novelty and infringement standards but creates new hurdles for patentees, especially concerning “skinny labelling” and proving off-label use.

Defining the undefinable: The challenges and opportunities for cell therapy IP

  • 13th May 2025
Understanding cell therapies for intellectual property protection is uniquely challenging because these living products are inherently complex and variable, making precise legal definitions difficult but crucial.

Commercial success is a nothing-burger for the EPO in Wegovy patent inventive step analysis (T 1701/22, Obesity treatment with semaglutide)

  • 9th May 2025
Novo Nordisk’s recent setback with the European Patent Office (EPO) for semaglutide offers a critical lesson: even revolutionary drugs face patent rejection if their underlying composition, dose, and pH are deemed obvious in light of prior art, proving that commercial success alone cannot ensure patentability.

Rose Hughes joins Evolve

  • 7th May 2025
Evolve Intellectual Property is pleased to welcome Dr. Rose Hughes as our new Patent Attorney.

The plausibility of diagnostic inventions: No data, no patent (T 0589/22)

  • 30th April 2025
Navigating the intricacies of patenting diagnostic and medical inventions can be challenging, but a recent EPO Board of Appeal decision offers crucial guidance: clear patient population definitions and robust supporting data in the initial application are paramount for establishing “plausibility” and ensuring patent validity.

OpenAI’s large language model (LLM) patents

  • 29th April 2025
For tech innovators seeking to understand evolving intellectual property strategies, OpenAI’s recent pivot offers essential guidance: far from relying solely on trade secrets, the AI leader is now aggressively pursuing and accelerating patent grants, signaling a significant shift.

AlphaFold: From Nobel Prize to drug-discovery gold mine?

  • 29th April 2025
AlphaFold, a machine learning model for predicting protein structure, is arguably one of the greatest achievements of AI so far. Whilst large language models such as ChatGPT can write poems and make pretty pictures, AlphaFold has the potential to dramatically impact the life-and-death world of drug discovery. AlphaFold represents truly ground-breaking science for which its…

IP strategy for AI-assisted drug discovery

  • 29th April 2025
AI has been hailed as a potentially revolutionary tool for accelerating and enhancing the difficult and expensive process of drug discovery. Medicine perhaps represents the field in which AI has the most to offer humanity. However, the nascent field of AI-assisted drug design also highlights the need for IP strategy to be as forward-looking and…
Previous Next

evolve® is a trading entity of Evolve Intellectual Property Limited. Evolve Intellectual Property Limited is regulated by the Intellectual Property Regulation Board (IPReg). Details of the UK professional rules can be found on the IPReg website

registered address: 49 Greek Street, London, England, W1D 4EG

website out of house

© 2025 All Rights Reserved

Keep in touch

Subscribe

Contact Us