PHARMACEUTICAL IP

  • Our Offering
    • Fractional IP counsel
    • Start-ups
    • Established pharma
    • International IP counsel
    • Investors
    • Due diligence
    • Evolve AI
    • Oppositions and appeals
  • Fractional IP counsel
  • Sectors
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Biotechnology
    • Biologics
    • Cell & gene therapy
    • AI drug discovery
    • Chemistry
  • Evolve Insights
    • Articles
    • Events & Webinars
    • Subscribe
  • About us
    • Our team
    • Join us
    • Contact us
  • Our Offering
    • Fractional IP counsel
    • Start-ups
    • Established pharma
    • International IP counsel
    • Investors
    • Due diligence
    • Evolve AI
    • Oppositions and appeals
  • Fractional IP counsel
  • Sectors
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Biotechnology
    • Biologics
    • Cell & gene therapy
    • AI drug discovery
    • Chemistry
  • Evolve Insights
    • Articles
    • Events & Webinars
    • Subscribe
  • About us
    • Our team
    • Join us
    • Contact us
  • Our offering
  • Fractional IP counsel
  • Sectors
  • Evolve Insights
  • Our team
  • Join us
  • Our offering
  • Fractional IP counsel
  • Sectors
  • Evolve Insights
  • Our team
  • Join us

Articles

Search & filter insights:

Search & filter insights:

Patenting Antibodies: The epitope claim is dead, long live the epitope claim

  • 19th December 2021
While US case law signals the “death” of the broad antibody epitope claim, recent European decisions suggest this patent format is still very much alive at the EPO.

When does pre-clinical data plausibly support a therapeutic effect? (T 966/18)

  • 23rd August 2021
The timing of a patent filing is critical to the patent’s validity. The earlier a patent is filed, the lower the risk of disclosures before the priority date destroying novelty and inventive step. Yet, the later a patent application is filed, the more time there is to obtain data and satisfy the requirement that the…

Reference to a hybridoma does not limit a product-by-process antibody claim (T 0032/17)

  • 18th July 2021
At the EPO you can define a antibody by reference to a hybridoma. But what if you deposited the hybridoma before you filed the patent?

Boeing’s comma drama: Commas and taking the description into account when construing a claim (T 1127/16)

  • 30th May 2021
It is not only the choice of words that matter in patent claim interpretation. As the recent decision in T 1127/16 shows, grammar can be similarly important.  

Does the requirement for a “technical contribution” in a novel selection survive? (if selecting from convergent lists) (T 1621/16)

  • 8th April 2019
The EPO’s strict patent amendment rules, particularly for combining features from “convergent lists,” were recently clarified by a Board of Appeal decision (T 1621/16). This decision impacts both amendment support and the novelty assessment of selection inventions.

Substance or device – a distinction without a difference?

  • 18th January 2019
There are important differences in the types of patent protection available for medical devices versus pharmaceuticals, but what happens if your product straddles the boundary between device and drug?

Purity can be unconventional, a new position for the EPO boards of appeal (T 1085/13)

  • 8th March 2018
The EPO suggest a new test for the novelty of inventions based on increased chemical purity.
Previous Next

evolve® is a trading entity of Evolve Intellectual Property Limited. Evolve Intellectual Property Limited is regulated by the Intellectual Property Regulation Board (IPReg). Details of the UK professional rules can be found on the IPReg website

registered address: 49 Greek Street, London, England, W1D 4EG

website out of house

© 2026 All Rights Reserved

Keep in touch

Subscribe

Contact Us