PHARMACEUTICAL IP

  • Our Offering
    • Fractional IP counsel
    • Start-ups
    • Established pharma
    • International IP counsel
    • Investors
    • Due diligence
    • Evolve AI
    • Oppositions and appeals
  • Fractional IP counsel
  • Sectors
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Biotechnology
    • Biologics
    • Cell & gene therapy
    • AI drug discovery
    • Chemistry
  • Evolve Insights
    • Articles
    • Events & Webinars
    • Subscribe
  • About us
    • Our team
    • Join us
    • Contact us
  • Our Offering
    • Fractional IP counsel
    • Start-ups
    • Established pharma
    • International IP counsel
    • Investors
    • Due diligence
    • Evolve AI
    • Oppositions and appeals
  • Fractional IP counsel
  • Sectors
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Biotechnology
    • Biologics
    • Cell & gene therapy
    • AI drug discovery
    • Chemistry
  • Evolve Insights
    • Articles
    • Events & Webinars
    • Subscribe
  • About us
    • Our team
    • Join us
    • Contact us
  • Our offering
  • Fractional IP counsel
  • Sectors
  • Evolve Insights
  • Our team
  • Join us
  • Our offering
  • Fractional IP counsel
  • Sectors
  • Evolve Insights
  • Our team
  • Join us

Optogenetics wins the 2026 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine

  • Sector: Patent law
  • 13th October 2026

Congratulations to Professor Karl Deisseroth (The Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Stanford University), Professor Peter Hegemann (Humboldt University of Berlin) and Professor Georg Nagel (University of Würzburg), who were jointly awarded the 2026 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their discoveries concerning light-gated ion channels and their pioneering contributions to the field of optogenetics.

From single-celled algae to brain switches

Their work began with Professor Hegemann’s curiosity about how the single-celled alga Chlamydomonas is able to swim towards a light source and, remarkably, why it responds to light more than twenty times faster than the human eye. Professor Hegemann proposed that the alga uses a single protein that both captures light and functions as an ion channel. In the early 2000s, Professor Hegemann and his colleague Professor Nagel proved the hypothesis correct. Professor Nagel expressed the algal genes in frog eggs and showed that the proteins they encode, named channelrhodopsin-1 and channelrhodopsin-2, are ion channels that open in response to light, generating an electrical signal.

Channelrhodopsin-2 was of interest to Professor Deisseroth, a psychiatrist looking for a molecular tool to study the function of nerve cells in the brain, in order to understand diseases such as depression, autism and schizophrenia. In 2005, Professor Deisseroth’s group successfully expressed the channelrhodopsin-2 gene in rat nerve cells, demonstrating that the cells became sensitive to blue light and could propagate electrical signals to other nerve cells. In 2007, Professor Deisseroth’s team expressed channelrhodopsin-2 in mice and showed that whisker movement could be controlled by delivering light through an optical fibre to switch on a selected population of neurons in the brain. Further research refined the technology, enabling the mapping of neural pathways and the identification of specific cell populations responsible for different brain functions.

Named optogenetics in 2006, the technology has also become an important tool for studying how the nervous system controls tissues outside the brain.

Beyond neuroscience and into medicine

Optogenetics is now used to identify precisely which neuronal circuits are responsible for disease symptoms and shows potential for identifying novel drug targets across a broad spectrum of psychiatric and neurological disorders, including depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease.

Commercial interest in optogenetics is growing and the first approved optogenetic therapy could arrive as early as next year. Last month, the biotechnology company Nanoscope Therapeutics announced that the US FDA had accepted its Biologics License Application (BLA) for Mogenry® (sonpiretigene isteparvovec), following favourable results in Phase 2b/3 development. Mogenry® is a gene therapy for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa that delivers a gene encoding a synthetic light-sensitive opsin to retinal bipolar cells, making them responsive to light. An FDA decision is expected in the first half of 2027. Nanoscope licensed CatCh, one of Mogenry’s three light-sensitive components which is an engineered variant of channelrhodopsin-2, from Max Planck Innovation (the technology transfer arm of the Max Planck Society). CatCh was developed by Professor Ernst Bamberg and colleagues at the Max Planck Institute of Biophysics in Frankfurt, the same institute where Professor Nagel, Professor Bamberg’s former PhD student, made his prize-winning discoveries.

Two other notable companies developing therapies for retinitis pigmentosa are Ray Therapeutics, which has developed its own optogenetic gene therapy candidate, RTX-015, currently undergoing Phase 2/3 development, and GenSight Biologics, which combines gene therapy with wearable goggle technology. As commercial interest grows, we can expect next-generation light-sensitive proteins and platforms, and expansion into related eye disorders.

Beyond eye disorders, light-sensitive proteins such as channelrhodopsin are being explored in preclinical research for applications including optical cochlear implants for hearing loss, making heart tissue light-sensitive to control arrhythmias, and light-triggered suppression of epileptic seizures.

The Nobel Prize winner Professor Deisseroth also co-founded the biopharmaceutical company MapLight Therapeutics, which uses an optogenetics-based drug discovery platform and has lead candidates in Phase 2 development. Optogenetics-guided drug discovery could have the broadest commercial reach of the technology, because the resulting drugs avoid the challenges associated with gene therapy, do not require delivery of light to tissues, and the approach has the potential to generate a much larger number of therapeutic candidates.

It will also be interesting to see how optogenetics combines with other technologies in the future, in particular, pairing neural pathway mapping with single-cell and spatial gene-expression data, as MapLight Therapeutics has done, and AI-driven target selection which has the potential to speed up the pathway from identifying a neural circuit associated with disease to identifying drug candidates that act on it.

Author: Oliver Lam

Oliver provides tailored strategic and commercial advice on a diverse range of technologies, including pharmaceuticals, immunotherapies, gene therapies, RNA therapeutics and diagnostic biomarkers. He has considerable experience in mRNA technology, particularly vaccine formulation, having supported a large international litigation relating to COVID-19 vaccines.

Oliver has experience in providing in-house counsel, having been seconded to a large multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology company. Oliver also possesses valuable industrial experience having worked in antibody discovery at UCB prior to becoming a patent attorney.

Clients value his energy, pragmatism and ability to deliver bespoke patenting strategies resulting in optimum protection for their businesses.

Related insights...

G1/25: What are the consequences?

  • 9th October 2026
Following the release of G1/25, questions have been circling as to what the decision means for the pending referral in G 1/26 and what the consequences (good or bad) are for applicants and patentees.

Lack of clarity by the backdoor: An ambiguity “may simply result in a broader interpretation” (T 0977/25)

  • 4th October 2026
In T 0977/25, a Board of Appeal found that the word “it” in an amended method claim for an e-cigarette cartridge was ambiguous.

Albert – Construe: defining your claims before they are defined for you.

  • 25th September 2026
Albert – Construe is the latest addition to Evolve’s proprietary AI toolkit.  It construes a set of claims, sets out with supporting evidence what each unclear term means, highlights any inconsistencies caused by other disclosures within an application, and flags where amendments may have changed the scope of a claim term.

Evolve Intellectual Property ranked in IAM Patent 1000

  • 13th September 2026
We are proud to announce that Evolve IP has been ranked in the 2026 publication of the IAM Patent 1000: United Kingdom – England and Wales. This year’s guide highlights our deep technical expertise in life sciences and our practical, strategic business focus. Congratulations to our patent attorneys, Steven Gurney who is ranked Silver and Rose Hughes who is…

IP Stars: Evolve recognised in 2026 Publication

  • 13th September 2026
We are delighted to announce that Evolve IP has been recognised in the 2026 IP STARS rankings. This distinction reflects our team’s ongoing dedication to exceptional intellectual property support, featuring key individual accolades for our patent attorneys. Steven Gurney has been recognised as a Patent Star. This specific ranking is awarded to senior practitioners who demonstrate proven excellence in…

Evolve Intellectual Property recognised in Legal500 rankings

  • 13th September 2026
Evolve Intellectual property is delighted to once again be recognised in the 2026 edition of Legal 500 for our growing specialised life science IP Practice in Cambridge, UK. The publication highlights Steven Gurney (founder and European, UK, and Australian patent attorney) for his work protecting key biopharmaceutical assets and for his focus on complex prosecution…

G1/25: What are the consequences?

  • 12th September 2026
Following the release of G1/25, questions have been circling as to what the decision means for the pending referral in G 1/26 and what the consequences (good or bad) are for applicants and patentees.

AI in the patent industry: Beware the MCP Trojan horse

  • 11th September 2026
As patent attorneys, we should all know by now not to put client confidential information to a non-enterprise version of an LLM. However, as the capabilities of AI tools become more complex, so too does the necessity of understanding what exactly they are doing and where our data goes, beyond the simple prompt.

BREAKING: When real doubt hits – G1/25 changes the description adaptation requirement for the worse

  • 4th September 2026
G 1/25, issued today, holds that the description must be adapted only where an “inconsistency” between the claims and description causes non-compliance with another requirement of the EPC.

New referral on claim interpretation and relevance of G1/24 to added matter confirmed (G1/26)

  • 23rd July 2026
We now have confirmation of a new referral to the EBA on claim interpretation (G1/26). As previously hinted, The Board of Appeal in T 0873/24 has decided to refer questions on the application of G1/24 to the assessment of added matter.
All Insights

evolve® is a trading entity of Evolve Intellectual Property Limited. Evolve Intellectual Property Limited is regulated by the Intellectual Property Regulation Board (IPReg). Details of the UK professional rules can be found on the IPReg website

registered address: 49 Greek Street, London, England, W1D 4EG

website out of house

© 2026 All Rights Reserved

Keep in touch

Subscribe

Contact Us